• Blog
  • Downloads
  • Purchase
  • Contact
TopQuadrant, Inc
  • Solutions
    • Wrap Column 1
      • Learn How Data Governance is Better Enabled using Knowledge Graphs
      • Manage Taxonomies or Ontologies
      • Manage Your Reference Data
      • Lower Cost Of Regulatory Compliance
    • Wrap Column 2
      • Manage Metadata and Data Lineage
      • Bridge Metadata Silos to Connect Business and Technical Data
      • Improve Search
  • Products
    • Wrap Column 1
      • TopBraid Enterprise Data Governance (TopBraid EDG)
      • TopBraid EDG Packages
      • ► EDG–Vocabulary Management
      • ► EDG–Metadata Management
      • ► EDG–Reference Data Management
      • ► EDG–Business Glossaries
    • Wrap Column 2
      • TopBraid EDG Additional Modules
      • ► TopBraid Tagger and AutoClassifier
      • ► TopBraid Explorer
      • IDE:
      • TopBraid Composer – Maestro Edition
  • Services
    • Wrap Column 1
      • Professional Services
      • Solution JumpStart Program
      • Support Portal
      • Learning Center
    • Wrap Column 2
      • Training Overview
      • TopBraid EDG Training
      • Intro to Semantic Standards with TopBraid Composer
      • TopBraid Technology Training
  • Resources
    • Wrap Column 1
      • Product Videos
      • Webinars
      • White Papers
      • Learning Center
    • Wrap Column 2
      • Product Documentation
      • FAQ
      • Support Portal
      • Case Studies
  • Company
    • Wrap Column 1
      • Customer Case Studies
      • News and Events
      • Careers
    • Wrap Column 2
      • About Us
      • Partners
  • Technology
    • Wrap Column 1
      • TopBraid Technology Overview
      • TopBraid Teamworks Framework
      • TopBraid Data Platform
      • What Are Knowledge Graphs?
    • Wrap Column 2
      • SHACL
      • GraphQL
      • SPARQL Web Pages (SWP)
      • SPARQLMotion
      • SPIN (SPARQL Rules)
Select Page

A Recap of December’s DG Winter Conference

by Steve Wartofsky | Jan 4, 2018 | Uncategorized, The Semantic Ecosystems Journal, topbraid, Data Governance, TopBraid EDG, SHACL, TopBraid EDG, Linked Data, SHACL, Semantic, metadata management, metadata management

Happy 2018! December was a busy month – as I’m sure many of you, like me, experienced. We started the month with a trip to the Data Governance Winter Conference in Delray Beach, Florida. It is a great place to be in December, not only for the weather but also for the great conversations with our peers. I wanted to start the New Year with a brief recap of those conversations, and to relay some key themes that I took away for those of you unable to attend this year.

One of the overriding themes was the evolving definition of “data governance.” It appears that customers (and some vendors) are still very much at quite different levels of understanding and engagement with the idea of data governance. While there is some core agreement on what data governance might encompass (and that is a very broad scope), everyone talking about data governance seems to mean something different – based on what they focus on and prioritize.

At the core, the top-down approach to Data Governance is all about getting executive buy-in, and establishing organizational structure and policies for data governance based on clearly-defined mission statements. In common in this regard, everyone starts with reducing cost, increasing ROI, improving CRM, and so on. But most companies, and especially government agencies, all have missions well beyond those we share in common: the increasing need to target specific audiences, with specific services, for specific periods of time, on specific types of platforms, in certain locations. This extensive segmentation of data consumption is already one of the most fundamentally new processes making the need for flexible data governance urgent.

The bottom-up approach starts with data quality and cleansing. It focuses a lot more on data management, and systems for insuring the trustworthiness and stability of the organization’s data lake, and builds out initiatives, business rules, frameworks and policies from there. This approach has been the standard for 30 years; however, data influx rates, the increasingly rapid additions of different types of data, and perhaps most importantly, the integration of varied types of access with complex context association are all becoming difficult to manage with such traditional data practices.

David Loshin and a number of others spoke specifically about a “middle-out” approach to Data Governance. Organizations often start from the bottom up, or the top down, and then lose focus on where to go, how to stitch the two approaches together. How do you get policy and business rules to meet reference data and data integrity management, and not end up in confusion?

At TopQuadrant we believe in a top-down, bottom-up and middle-out approach to Data Governance, as we outlined in the talk at the conference by our CTO, Ralph Hodgson: “Delivering Business Value by “Putting Data Governance to Work”. You can also read more about this in our latest press release.

There were also many challenges noted, even for those who seem well on their way with a data governance program. These include the continual introduction of new systems and types of data, the rapidly increasing scale of enterprise data in use and that must be managed, and frequent changes in organizational structures. These challenges are being constantly driven and amplified by the rapidly changing goals, opportunities and the dynamic nature of emerging situations organizations have to cope with (mergers, changing markets, interruptions in service, supply lines, etc.). With cloud, multi-cloud, sensors, mobile data, grid systems and the internet of increasingly smart things all proliferating quickly, linking data across multiple platforms for multiple purposes — all the while delivering the right info to the right people at the right time — will be critical for governance and organizational success. Any inflexibility in your current data governance platform will soon become obvious.

In addition to the above challenges, the need for automation of processes – including data governance processes – also became apparent at this year’s conference. In their comprehensive talk, IBM discussed the potential weak link data stewards can become in the process if they are overwhelmed in their efforts. Across the board, the search for the automation of data governance wherever possible is advancing.

Last but not least and articulated most precisely and extensively in Malcolm Chisholm’s presentation (San Francisco Partners) – is the way in which any kind of compliance definition, large or small (from GDPR or HIPAA to ISO standards), is likely over time to evolve, in the larger instances (he cites GDPR for his example) with a continuously growing opus of case law built around all the specific, contestable terms, and in the smaller instances, with continual interpretation and revision of standards as they are rolled out, tested, and meet the limits of what they constrain.

As noted earlier, this is all occurring in an environment where the core concepts and features of data governance don’t seem to have coalesced yet into any agreed-upon standards. Consultants and SMEs in the field seem to be in an active contest to create the terms of definition. What is clear though is that as any kind of structuring system – data governance itself included – becomes more rigorous and increases its reach, across extensively heterogeneous environments, it is going to become more and more susceptible to the need for flexibility, transformability, rapid adoption to a huge sea of ongoing changes beneath what it formalizes. Systems incapable of such flexibility will fail or be quickly tossed aside, due to expense and potential catastrophe.

Learn more about how TopQuadrant’s Enterprise Data Governance(EDG) can help you to overcome these challenges with a semantic approach to Data Governance.

Recent Posts

  • Data Cataloging with Knowledge Graphs
  • Information governance 101: The regulatory compliance survival kit
  • Overview of TopBraid EDG Ontologies
  • Q4 2020 Newsletter
  • Automating the Mapping of Data Elements to Business Terms

Recent Comments

  • Brenton on Creating Web Services with the TopBraid Platform
  • naprzegladarkegry.blogspot.com on TopBraid Enterprise Vocabulary Net
  • Irene Polikoff on How to: Publish your Linked Data with TopBraid Live SPARQL Endpoints
  • Irene Polikoff on Ontologies and Data Models – are they the same?
  • Chino on How to: Publish your Linked Data with TopBraid Live SPARQL Endpoints

Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009

Categories

  • Uncategorized
  • The Semantic Ecosystems Journal
  • topbraid
  • life sciences
  • SPARQL
  • Ontologies
  • Semantic
  • metadata management
  • GDPR
  • GDPR
  • metadata management
  • Governance
  • GraphQL
  • Big Data
  • Linked Data
  • Reference Data Management
  • TopBraid RDM
  • Data Governance
  • ontology
  • collaborative ontology management
  • TopBraid EVN
  • TopBraid EDG
  • SHACL
  • TopBraid EDG
  • Data Lineage
  • FIBO
  • Financial Services
  • Data Lineage
  • FIBO
  • Linked Data
  • Linked Data
  • TopBraid EVN
  • SHACL
  • Ontologies
  • IDMP
  • TopBraid EVN
  • Financial Services
  • News
  • Mentions
  • Press Release
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Webinars
  • Knowledge Graphs
  • taxonomies
  • Data Cataloging
  • Business Glossaries

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • About Us
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal
  • Terms of Use
  • Twitter
  • RSS
Copyright 2020 TopQuadrant, Inc. All Rights Reserved.